Collaboration to Coopetition: Navigating the Fine Line in Connectivity and Digital Technology Partnerships

In twenty-five years of operating, CW has seen much change in the connectivity landscape, and no more so than now. The fast-evolving wireless ecosystem has entered an era in which interdependence is the new competitive advantage. 5G rollouts, Open RAN experiments, edge computing, private networks for industry 4.0, and looming 6G research agendas all demand resources, skills, scope and capital which no single operator or vendor can do alone.

Collaboration is not just beneficial, it is essential - and strategic alliances, joint ventures and cross-industry consortia are becoming increasingly common.

When industry players come together - especially those where markets, services or technologies may overlap - the potential for innovation is huge.

However, the line between collaboration and competition is often razor-thin. The very partners we need today may bid against us tomorrow - and it’s this tension which ultimately paralyses joint efforts and leads to shallow, short-lived partnerships.

Cambridge Wireless (CW) lives in this delicate space every day: we convene more than 200 members and 1,000s of companies in our wider network - ranging from challenger startups to top-tier operators and hyperscalers – who collaborate and compete vigorously in global markets.

We have witnessed in the industry how quickly healthy collaboration can veer into unhealthy rivalry if expectations, processes and culture are not carefully managed. And, having personally worked with technology companies and startups for more than 20 years, I’ve seen both ends of the spectrum: breakthrough innovation enabled by mutual trust, and promising alliances derailed by suspicion and self-interest.

The Roots of the Challenge

Before discussing solutions, it’s important to understand the roots of the challenge.

Telecom companies often collaborate in areas like network sharing or rural coverage, but they still compete fiercely for subscribers. Vendors may co-develop solutions but later bid against each other for implementation, and it’s this inherent market tension that cannot be ignored.

One party may contribute more IP, resources or access, creating an imbalance that leads to mistrust.

Without well-defined boundaries and governance, collaborations can drift into sensitive areas (e.g. customer data, pricing strategies, core technologies) where competitive instincts can too easily take over and undermine the stability of a long-term alliance.

So, the challenge is clear: how do we prevent collaboration from becoming competition?

The solution, of course, isn’t to avoid collaboration but to manage it better. Enter the concept of ‘coopetition’ - a strategic blend of cooperation and competition – which acknowledges that collaboration and rivalry often co-exist in many innovation-driven industries, and success depends on striking the right balance.

Below, I’ve outlined five useful principles that can help joint ventures and bilateral/multilateral projects protect their upside while preserving fair competition:

1. Aligned objectives not opportunity

Too many technology collaborations are born out of necessity e.g. network-sharing to cut costs, or the formation of standards bodies to avoid fragmentation. It’s vital that partners engage in upfront, open dialogue about why they’re collaborating: What are the shared goals? How will success be defined? What are the red lines?

2. Defined guardrails  

Partners should work together with clear ‘rules of engagement’ and not just legal agreements. The robust framework should include:

• Scope documents setting out clear project briefs from the beginning and defining who you do and do not want to collaborate with
• IP ownership clauses outlining who owns what, and how shared innovation will be handled post-project
• Define access rights to output and intended use from the beginning
• Clarify PR guidelines with all participants to avoid unapproved announcements.

3. Create structural separation where necessary

Rivalry is inevitable, which is why you should never rely solely on NDAs. To reduce the temptation of overreach, use neutral workspaces to house joint initiatives and/ or sensitive workstreams. Physical firewalls provide a psychological and legal distance, enabling engineers to collaborate and innovation to flourish without second-guessing motives, and separate shared folders provided both transparency and ring-fencing of data.

4. Agree an exit strategy from the start

Collaborations have lifecycles, and they don’t all last as long as intended. Therefore, it’s vital to have in place, from the start, a graceful exit strategy which preserves goodwill and protects proprietary information. Knowing the divorce terms up-front will, paradoxically, benefit ‘the marriage’.

Every accelerator agreement should therefore contain:

• A sunset termination clause: either time-bound (e.g. two years after first customer pilot) or milestone-bound (e.g. after three public reference sites)
• IP unwind rules: who retains what, and at what royalty, once the joint entity dissolves
• A short moratorium: on predatory pricing or staff poaching in the geography/ domain of collaboration for say 6 -12 months.

5. Build a foundation of trust

In my experience, the most successful collaborations are cemented in trust. This doesn’t mean blind faith but transparency in contributions (even when inconvenient) and equity in recognition and rewards, which will prevent one party feeling exploited or excluded. This is enabled with clear systems and robust exit agreements, including benefits and restrictions agreed from the outset. Trust is the glue that holds collaborations together in the face of competitive pressures.

This is something CW has decades of experience in.

One of our many examples is seven years ago, in late 2018, CW curated an Accelerator called ‘The Hive’ and secured five innovative startups to work alongside selected R&D scientists from a global manufacturer of haircare & styling products for a period of three months. The manufacturer had just released their newest device and had also put together a concept for an upgraded version which would allow the user to connect their device wirelessly to their smartphone or tablet, enabling them to access exclusive hair-styling tutorials. This device would also detect hair health issues and warn the user if any were picked up.

Our team worked with the manufacturer to scope out the problem and identify the skills needed from the five startup teams. 

The direction was explicit: prove commercial use-cases within 18 months. Every working group decision – including network design, IP disposition, publicity - was tested against that litmus. Such clarity reduces turf debates and prevents scope-creep into competitive areas.

For the manufacturer, the Accelerator decreased the time taken to bring this product to market from 24 months to six months. They were provided with a unique opportunity to work alongside new talent and expertise to grow the skills base of its own R&D team.

And it wasn’t just the manufacturer that benefited. Four out of the five startups signed supply contracts with the manufacturer and planned to generate revenue from the project. Each startup gained skills and knowledge from the others that also added value to other projects, and they built valuable new relationships that supported the technical and commercial growth of their business.

And, such was the success of this collaboration, that Cambridge Wireless has gone on to complete many more similar projects with equal success.

Collaboration is now a key competency

Connectivity and digital technology is no longer a siloed industry. As we move into the next phase (smart cities, autonomous transport, private 5G, 6G), interdependence will only grow.

And our experience has shown that these projects have a quicker turn around and positive result as they were managed by a neutral partner to facilitate the engagement.

Collaboration without boundaries breeds chaos, while competition without cooperation leads to fragmentation. Therefore, the way forward lies in mature, mindful coopetition. When done right, it allows all players to jointly tackle the sector’s biggest challenges, without sacrificing their unique market positions.

In this new era, success will be measured by how well we play with others - without losing ourselves in the process.

Click here to view the article